Vincent v. Doebert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the notice of the right of first refusal was effective only after the holder of the right was notified of the true terms of the offer that the owners were willing to accept
• noting that “a reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and cohesive legal arguments presented [citation] and issues not sufficiently presented can be waived [citation]”
• requiring contracting party to exercise discretion “reasonably and not arbitrarily or capriciously” and to ensure “the other party’s right to receive the fruits of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).