Opinions by Walter Olds
Cases where "Olds" appears in the judges field. Imperfect matching by last name; expect some noise.
- 5/17/1957Territory of Hawaii v. Shinohara
- 5/29/1939Curry v. McCanless
- 11/23/1915Klepper v. Klepper
- 2/6/1912Leader Realty Co. v. Markham
- 5/23/1893Peed v. Elliott
- 5/23/1893Horn v. Bennett
- 5/22/1893Lloyd v. State ex rel. Banta
- 5/18/1893Wilmore v. Stetler
- 5/16/1893McAllister v. Henderson
- 5/12/1893Wertz v. Jones
- 5/11/1893Peden v. Cavins
- 5/10/1893McKeen v. Porter
- 4/28/1893Harlan v. State
- 4/27/1893Iddings v. Iddings
- 4/26/1893Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall v. Baker
- 4/21/1893Harseim v. Booth
- 4/20/1893Boyd v. Weaver
- 4/19/1893State v. Lewis
- 4/8/1893Citizens' Street Railroad v. Merl
- 4/6/1893Montgomery v. Hines
- 4/4/1893Gimbel v. Green
- 3/31/1893State ex rel. Thornton v. Yant
- 3/30/1893Jackson v. Swope
- 3/29/1893Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Smoot
- 3/29/1893Carriger v. Kennedy
- 3/28/1893Comegys v. Emerick
- 3/17/1893Neubacher v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.
- 3/16/1893Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Wilson
- 3/15/1893Allen v. Bland
- 3/10/1893Prothero v. Citizens' Street Railway Co.
- 3/8/1893State ex rel. Renner v. Curry
- 2/22/1893Yelton v. Evansville & Indianapolis Railroad
- 2/18/1893Indianapolis & Vincennes Railway Co. v. Backus
- 2/17/1893Boling v. Miller
- 2/16/1893Littell v. State
- 2/15/1893City of Bedford v. Green
- 2/14/1893City of Bedford v. Willard
- 1/28/1893Smith v. Blair
- 1/26/1893Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ketcham
- 1/24/1893Bass Foundry & Machine Works v. Board of Commissioners
- 1/13/1893Cohee v. Baer
- 1/12/1893Ogle v. Edwards
- 1/11/1893State ex rel. Haywood v. Earl
- 1/6/1893Holmes v. Holmes
- 1/4/1893Millisor v. Wagner
- 1/3/1893State ex rel. Dunkleberg v. Porter
- 12/22/1892Collins v. Dresslar
- 12/21/1892Fisher v. Bush
- 12/20/1892Bradshaw v. Van Winkle
- 12/17/1892Parker v. State ex rel. Powell
- 12/16/1892Williamson v. Brandenberg
- 12/15/1892Florer v. State ex rel. Arnold
- 12/13/1892State v. Pennsylvania Co.
- 12/13/1892State v. Indiana & Illinois Southern Railroad
- 11/29/1892Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. McDaniel
- 11/29/1892Popijoy v. Miller
- 11/28/1892Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Sands
- 11/22/1892Hill v. Pollard
- 11/18/1892Watt v. Board of Commissioners
- 11/17/1892Alkire v. Alkire
- 11/15/1892Geddes v. Blackmore
- 10/27/1892Hecht v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.
- 10/26/1892Batman v. Snoddy
- 10/14/1892State ex rel. Jaseph v. Mitchell
- 10/13/1892National Bank v. Lock
- 10/11/1892York v. Rockwood
- 10/8/1892Hutchings v. Hay
- 10/7/1892Percifield v. Black
- 10/6/1892Zeigler v. Mize
- 10/5/1892File v. Springel
- 10/5/1892Markover v. Krauss
- 10/4/1892Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Craucher
- 9/22/1892Conrad v. State
- 9/17/1892Wood v. School Corp.
- 9/15/1892Indianapolis Chair Manufacturing Co. v. Swift
- 9/14/1892Williamson v. Woten
- 9/13/1892American Cannel Coal Co. v. Clemens
- 6/17/1892Bachelor v. Cole
- 6/16/1892Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Morgan
- 6/15/1892Black v. Plunkett
- 6/11/1892Thompson v. Thompson
- 6/9/1892Hall v. State
- 6/8/1892Hubbard v. Moore
- 5/24/1892Weigold v. Pross
- 5/24/1892Jaseph v. People's Sayings Bank
- 5/23/1892Hennel v. Board of Commissioners
- 5/20/1892Kern v. Isgrigg
- 5/19/1892Thompson v. Goldthwait
- 5/18/1892McWhinney v. City of Logansport
- 5/14/1892Horman v. Hartmetz
- 5/14/1892Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Stein
- 5/12/1892Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Pritchard
- 5/11/1892Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Smith
- 5/11/1892Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. Smith
- 5/10/1892Hacker v. Conrad
- 4/29/1892State ex rel. Walden v. Vanosdal
- 4/28/1892Morris v. Board of Commissioners
- 4/27/1892Ewing v. Bratton
- 4/23/1892Fowler v. Wallace
- 4/22/1892Allen v. State
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.