Montgomery v. Hines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “lot” and “street” are two distinct terms and that “lot” is the “platted territory” set apart for individual use and occupancy while “street” is the area set apart for use by the public
• dealing with construction of a deed rather than a zoning problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mall, Inc. v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 36×
• State of California v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1948-09-01· cited 31×
• Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1960-03-31· cited 24×
• Stockdale v. Lester
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1968-04-09· cited 12×
• In re Appeal of Bailey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-07-26· cited 10×
• Peake v. Azusa Valley Savings Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-02-14· cited 8×
• Opinion No. Oag 1-77, (1977)
  Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1977-01-10