Zurich Insur. Co. v. Friedlander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the mere ownership of and the receipt of rent from improved real estate do not cause the owner and recipient to be engaged in business but, if he actively manages or operates, or participates in the management or operation of the property, he may be”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kastendike v. Baltimore Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-12-14· cited 19×
• Springer v. Erie Insurance Exchange
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-24· cited 18×
• McCloskey v. Republic Insurance
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-29· cited 16×
• Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Public Service Commission
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1984-02-07· cited 13×
• State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v. Quirt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-06· cited 7×
• Blackstone v. Sharma
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-08-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona State Tax Commission v. First Bank Building Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-15· cited 17×
• Bott v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1948-06-14· cited 11×
• Wallace v. United States
  W.D. New York· 1943-04-22· cited 3×
• General Investment Funds Real Estate Holding Co. v. Gildenhorn
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-12-15· cited 2×