Kastendike v. Baltimore Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a contention that an expansion occurred when the owner of dairy business converted the property, which was a nonconforming use, into a riding academy
• mere change of ownership does not destroy a nonconforming use; a use transferred to a successor in interest will continue to be legal so long as the nature and character of that use is unchanged and substantially the same facilities are used
• mere change of ownership does not destroy a nonconforming use; a use transferred to a successor in interest will continue to be legal so long as the nature and character of that use is unchanged and substantially the same facilities are used
• property owner may intensify a nonconforming use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).