Zoological Society v. INTECH Construction Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where specific or exact terms appear to conflict with broader or more general terms, the former is more likely to express the meaning of the parties with respect to the situation than the general language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
  Supreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
• Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 3,702×
• Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.
  Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
• Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson
  Supreme Court· 1995-01-18· cited 1,626×
• Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1995-03-06· cited 1,102×
• PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, Appellants
  Third Circuit· 1990-12-31· cited 247×
• Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 125×
• Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-09-15· cited 90×
• Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-21· cited 90×
• PBS Coal, Inc. v. Hardhat Mining, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-20· cited 33×
• Dickler v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-30· cited 29×