Zink v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The phrase 'within this state’ is not ambiguous and very lucidly indicates the legislature’s intent to encompass all lands in the state.” Intoxicated defendant was \spinning donuts” on a private construction site.
• “The phrase ‘within this state’ is not ambiguous and very lucidly indicates the legislature’s intent to encompass all lands in the state.” Intoxicated defendant was “spinning donuts” on a private construction site.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Patricia S. Reed v. Joshua D. Beckett
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2016-10-26
• Reynolds v. State
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1986-09-30
• Lanier v. State
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1989-09-26
• State v. Fingar
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1991-02-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Combs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-28· cited 350×