Skip to main content

Zieber v. Bogert

Citations

  • 773 A.2d 758
  • 565 Pa. 376
  • 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1259
  • 2001 WL 686922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding jury may consider evidence of increased risk and/or fear of recurrence of cancer in awarding damages
  • in a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to order a C-T scan which would have revealed that the plaintiff had lymphoma in his abdomen
  • in a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to order a C-T scan which would have revealed that the plaintiff had lymphoma in his abdomen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Saylor, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Zieber v. Bogert

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.