Skip to main content

In re C.M.T.

Citations

  • 861 A.2d 348
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 418
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the juvenile court’s finding that a school district’s compliance with an individualized education plan (IEP
  • noting “‘judge should receive, and if necessary should seek out, evidence from objective, disinterested witnesses,’ e.g., neighbors, teachers, social workers, and psychological experts.”
  • agency establishes habitual truancy through school attendance records showing that absences are unexcused, which raises an inference that the absences are “without justification” that may be rebutted by the parent or child
  • defendant’s challenges to judgment of conviction were not moot due to his completion of sentence but his challenge to terms of conditional discharge was moot because court could not afford practical relief as to such claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Gantman, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re C.M.T.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.