Zieba v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because husband’s expenditures out of community funds on paramours constituted breach of fiduciary duty and waste, the community estate was entitled to reimbursement for those funds
• holding the enhancement value is the correct measure of reimbursement
• finding no fault with trial court’s refusal to reimburse community for funds spent by husband on obligations arising from prior marriage because obligations were imposed on husband by court order
• listing non-exclusive factors a trial court considers in an unequal division of the marital estate
• finding trial court abused its discretion in refusing to reimburse community for husband’s $100,000 cash withdrawal from bank account where there was no evidence wife consented to withdrawal although wife testified she knew about withdrawal and did not question husband about it
• overruling claim to reverse reimbursement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).