Zellmer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proper questions about prospective jurors’ views on parole eligibility as part of a potential sentence in capital cases do not include “[e]xposure to the complexities of the future role of the Board of Pardons and Paroles should the sentence allow for the possibility of parole”
• setting forth standard applicable in cases where juries are required to consider parole eligibility pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-31.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lance v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-02-25· cited 70×
• Stinski v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-01· cited 65×
• Ellington v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-19· cited 61×
• Rhode v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-01· cited 49×
• Raheem v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-03-11· cited 46×
• Riley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-10-25· cited 44×
• Lamar v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-06-28· cited 41×
• Sealey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-03-01· cited 36×
• Buttram v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-06-12· cited 30×
• Presnell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-07-16· cited 26×
• Spickler v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-01-13· cited 17×
• Lámar v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-06-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-02-26· cited 95×
• Burgess v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-12-05· cited 89×
• Walker v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 50×
• Turner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-07-14· cited 49×
• Cross v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-09-13· cited 20×