Skip to main content
· 3/7/1994

Vicente Osorio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Amicus Curiae

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 1017
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that union activity was properly viewed as political because effort to legalize strikes by municipal workers could be perceived by government as threat to its authority
  • ruling that the BIA erred by concluding that an applicant’s labor dispute with his government was economic and non-political without “examin[ing][ ]either the political dimension of th[e] dispute []or its political context”
  • holding that ʺunion activities [can] imply a political opinion,ʺ and not merely economic position
  • concluding \that union leaders like Osorio are at grave risk of persecution by Guatemalan authorities\
  • ruling that the BIA erred by concluding 10 that an applicant’s labor dispute with his government was 11 economic and non-political without “examin[ing] []either the 12 political dimension of th[e] dispute []or its political 13 context”
  • finding that the Board’s reasoning would result in Solzhenitzn’s dis- pute with the Soviet Union being characterized as literary rather than politi- cal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Oakes, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.