Seventh Circuit· 11/7/1978
Zed Daniels v. Richard L. Kieser
Citations
- 586 F.2d 64
- 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff had already been served one subpoena; second subpoena was misplaced by U.S. Marshal
- “Because defendant was attempting to secure Daniels’ presence at the resumption of the trial[,] . . . he was functioning as an advocate rather than as an investigator.”
- “Plaintiff subsequently testified as a government witness when Phoenix’s trial resumed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Wisdom, Sprecher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hampton v. HanrahanSeventh Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 368×
- Detrice Garmon v. County of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 245×
- L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellD.C. Circuit· 1983-06-21· cited 241×
- Al-Kidd v. AshcroftNinth Circuit· 2009-09-04· cited 209×
- Rodney Taylor v. Michael KavanaghSecond Circuit· 1981-01-26· cited 140×
- Charles Ashbrook and Master Chef, Inc. v. Harlan HoffmanSeventh Circuit· 1980-05-19· cited 110×
- Simons v. BellingerD.C. Circuit· 1980-01-04· cited 101×
- Adams v. HansonSixth Circuit· 2011-08-30· cited 68×
- Whelehan v. County of MonroeW.D. New York· 1983-02-22· cited 66×
- Marvin Hamilton v. Richard M. DaleySeventh Circuit· 1985-12-04· cited 62×
- Flagler v. TrainorSecond Circuit· 2011-11-21· cited 57×
- Morton W. Weir, Judith S. Liebman, Robert M. Berdahl, and Donald L. Bitzer v. Franklin M. Propst, Respondent-PlaintiffSeventh Circuit· 1990-10-01· cited 50×
- Cooney v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 37×
- People v. Patrick J. Gorman Consultants, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-12-30· cited 31×
- Freeman v. BlairEighth Circuit· 1986-06-04· cited 27×
- Barrett v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1985-10-08· cited 26×
- Praggastis v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1988-03-29· cited 23×
- Chrisco v. ShafranD. Delaware· 1981-02-11· cited 21×
- Villars v. KubiatowskiN.D. Illinois· 2015-09-02· cited 16×
- Clay v. FriedmanN.D. Illinois· 1982-06-11· cited 15×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court· 1978-06-05· cited 5,547×
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 3,397×
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court· 1927-12-05· cited 223×
- Cylinder Gas, Chemical, Petroleum, Auto-Service & Accessory Drivers, Local No. 283 v. Ottawa Silica Co.Supreme Court· 1974-02-19· cited 189×
- Hampton v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1973-08-24· cited 167×
- Briggs v. GoodwinD.C. Circuit· 1977-09-21· cited 153×
- Ezell Littleton v. Peyton Berbling, Individually and as State's Attorney for Alexander County, IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1972-12-11· cited 123×
- Heidelberg v. HammerSeventh Circuit· 1978-06-08· cited 100×
- Yaselli v. GoffSupreme Court· 1927-12-05· cited 86×
- Claude Grow v. Thomas G. Fisher, Individually and in His Capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of the State of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1975-10-09· cited 75×
- Elizabeth Cawley v. Harland Warren, Wendall Thompson and Harold WenslandSeventh Circuit· 1954-10-13· cited 63×
- Louis French v. William Corrigan and John MacKay and William v. Hopf and Edward Van De Houten, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1970-08-20· cited 50×
- J. D. Pflaumer, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeE.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-05-18· cited 34×
- Perez v. BorchersSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 21×
- Irene Perez v. Charles R. Borchers, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1978-02-02· cited 17×
- Maurice Tyler v. Joseph WitkowskiSeventh Circuit· 1975-02-26· cited 14×
- Beaver v. CareyN.D. Illinois· 1977-01-18· cited 7×
- Daniels v. KieserN.D. Illinois· 1978-03-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.