Zed Daniels v. Richard L. Kieser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff had already been served one subpoena; second subpoena was misplaced by U.S. Marshal
• “Because defendant was attempting to secure Daniels’ presence at the resumption of the trial[,] . . . he was functioning as an advocate rather than as an investigator.”
• “Plaintiff subsequently testified as a government witness when Phoenix’s trial resumed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).