Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 6/8/1978

Heidelberg v. Hammer

Citations

  • 577 F.2d 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim against prosecutors for destruction of exculpatory evidence is barred by absolute prosecutorial immunity
  • holding that a prosecutor is absolutely immune from a suit claiming that he destroyed and falsified evidence
  • holding that a prosecutor is entitled to absolute immunity from suit claiming that he destroyed and falsified evidence
  • explaining that the charge that prosecutors destroyed evidence is “barred by the doctrine of absolute official immunity” (referencing Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 427 (1976))
  • finding claims that prosecutors destroyed and falsified evidence and suborned perjury barred by absolute immunity
  • distinguishing the defense of \absolute immunity\ from \failure to state a claim\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.