Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 9/29/1986

Zalman v. Armstrong

Citations

  • 802 F.2d 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • measuring whether a state prosecution was ongoing from the date the district court held a hearing on a motion for temporary injunctive relief
  • noting “the Supreme Court has never found” the flagrant unconstitutionality exception “to be applicable since it first announced the exception in Younger”
  • “[T]he proper time of reference for determining the applicability of Younger abstention is the time that the federal complaint is filed.”
  • “[T]he proper time of reference for determining the applicability of Younger abstention is the time that the federal complaint is filed.”
  • “[T]he proper time of reference for determining the applicability of Younger abstention is the time that the federal complaint is filed.”
  • “the proper time of reference for determining the applicability of Younger abstention is the time that the federal complaint is filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zalman v. Armstrong

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.