Skip to main content
· 5/11/1984

Joseph Despain, Cross-Appellants v. Marlin Johnston, Cross-Appellees

Citations

  • 731 F.2d 1171
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he operation of the Younger doctrine is dependent upon the ability of the state courts to provide an adequate remedy for the violation of federal rights.”
  • stating that “[t]he operation of the Younger doctrine is dependent upon the ability of the state courts to provide an adequate remedy for the violation of federal rights.”
  • “If a state action is pending at [the time that the federal complaint is filed], the federal action must be dismissed.”
  • “The state interest that is triggered by the institution of the state proceeding continues through the completion of the state appeals process.”
  • “The state has a strong interest in enforcing its criminal laws.”
  • “The state has a strong interest in enforcing its criminal laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Reavley, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.