Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “According to Rule 19’s text, two conditions must be satisfied for a party to qualify as a ‘required party’ under Rule 19(a)(1)(B
• “We conclude that [the absent party’s] reputational interests in this ac- tion are not legally protected under Rule 19.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
  Fourth Circuit· 2020-11-19· cited 74×
• Anna Galaza v. Chad Wolf
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-04-08· cited 14×
• Helix Inv. Mgmt., LP v. Privilege Direct Corp.
  M.D. Florida· 2019-03-05· cited 5×
• In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust
  M.D. Florida· 2016-06-16· cited 3×
• Tabitha Sperring v. Llr, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-04-23· cited 2×
• Union Pacific Railroad v. Runyon
  D. Oregon· 2017-03-08· cited 2×
• Rediger v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.
  D. Oregon· 2017-04-14
• Deschutes River Alliance v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.
  D. Oregon· 2018-06-11
• Global K9 Protection Group, LLC v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2026-05-14

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
• United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
• Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 1,049×
• Georgia v. Pennsylvania Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 482×
• Concha v. London
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-08-15· cited 421×
• William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-10· cited 371×
• Discover Bank v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 370×
• Temple v. Synthes Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-07· cited 368×
• Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-09-06· cited 344×
• Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-03-03· cited 204×
• Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 198×
• United States v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1943-05-24· cited 167×
• Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-10-15· cited 152×
• Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-07-03· cited 148×
• Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo Nation
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-02· cited 138×
• Home Buyers Warranty Corporation v. Lois Hanna
  Fourth Circuit· 2014-04-29· cited 136×
• Wilbur v. Locke
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-09-09· cited 99×
• Benjamin Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-03· cited 92×
• Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of Colusa Indian Community v. California
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-10-24· cited 82×
• Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.
  C.D. California· 1971-03-17· cited 82×