Zabinsky v. Gelber Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of an oral promise is sufficient to support a finding of mutual assent under the IWPCA
• Wage Payment Act “provides an employee with remedies more expansive than a common law breach of contract action when it uses the words ‘employment contract or agreement’ ” (emphasis omitted)
• “The Act provides an employee with remedies more expansive than a common law breach of contract action when it uses the words ‘employment contract or agreement.’”
• the IWPCA “requires only a manifestation of mutual assent on the part of two or more persons; parties may enter into an ‘agreement’ without the formalities and accompanying legal protections of a contract”
• Act “re- quires only a manifestation of mutual assent on the part of two or more persons; parties may enter into an ‘agreement’ without the formalities and accompanying legal protections of a contract”
• “[T]he IWPCA holds the employer only to its promise under the employment agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).