Lawrence Hess v. Kanoski & Associat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that breach of a termination-notice provision “requires the [employer] to pay [Plaintiff] whatever compensation [she] was due during that time”
• dismissing plaintiff's claims for tortious interference with contract for several reasons other than plaintiff's at-will employment
• rejecting, as insufficient to state a claim, allegations that “defendants combined with each other to commit unlawful acts”
• dismissing the plaintiffs tortious interference with contract claim for reasons other than the plaintiffs at-will employment
• rejecting, as insufficient to state a claim, allegations that “defendants combined with each other to commit unlawful acts”
• “Illinois courts have explained that an agreement under the IWPCA is broader than a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).