Skip to main content
· 1/4/2002

Yunger v. Oliver

Citations

  • 803 So. 2d 884
  • 2002 WL 10157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming order on appeal and holding that two permissive counterclaims were properly stricken by the trial court as sham pleadings; finding three counterclaims to be compulsory counterclaims that must await an appeal from the final judgment
  • affirming order on appeal and holding that two permissive counterclaims were properly stricken by the trial court as sham pleadings; finding three counterclaims to be compulsory counterclaims that must await an appeal from the final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.