Sapienza v. Karland, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pleading should not be stricken in its entirety if there is an issue upon which the pleading could be found good in part
• pleading may be considered sham when its falsity clearly and indisputably appears

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rogers v. First National Bank at Winter Park
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1970-03-18· cited 22×
• Destiny Const. v. Martin K. Eby Const
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03· cited 18×
• Slatko v. Virgin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-03-02· cited 15×
• Diamond R. Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Packing
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-30· cited 8×
• Yunger v. Oliver
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-04· cited 8×
• Kirby v. Adkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-20· cited 7×
• Ader v. Temple Ner Tamid
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-11-09· cited 7×
• Rogers v. First National Bank at Winter Park
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-04-08· cited 6×
• Harmon v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-18· cited 5×
• West Palm Golf Commission v. Adams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-16· cited 3×
• Denton v. Getson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-25· cited 1×
• Becker v. Dulberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-02-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meadows v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-09-28· cited 31×
• Nenow v. Ceilings & Specialties, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-03-01· cited 7×