Youngquist v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a new trial is warranted only when both error and prejudice are established
• explaining that a district court errs when its jury instructions “materially misstate[] the law”
• discussing the concept of pecuniary loss and listing 12 factors to consider in determining a fair amount
• listing factors for a jury to consider in awarding pecuniary damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-04-10· cited 18×
• Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-07-21· cited 8×
• DOMAGALA v. Rolland
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-08-31· cited 4×
• Ouradnik v. Ouradnik
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-05-08· cited 3×
• Curtis v. Transcor America, LLC
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-06-28· cited 3×
• Willis v. Indiana Harbor Steamship Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-10-19· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kuhnau
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-03-01· cited 128×
• Fussner v. Andert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-12-15· cited 95×
• Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-01-25· cited 68×
• State v. Glidden
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-05-18· cited 42×
• Rowe v. Munye
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 27×
• Bolinger v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1887-02-11· cited 23×
• Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-29· cited 22×
• Paulson v. Lapa, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-01-23· cited 16×
• Rowe v. Munye
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-02-17· cited 7×
• Youngquist v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-06-27· cited 1×