Skip to main content
· 1/25/1974

Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis

Citations

  • 214 N.W.2d 672
  • 298 Minn. 224
  • 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that hospital records admissible
  • concluding that hospital records admissible
  • affirming the trial court's decision to grant a new trial where the trial court had erroneously instructed the jury in a way that led the jury to believe that the defendant was held to an ordinary care standard rather than the \highest degree of care\ standard
  • affirming the trial court’s decision to grant a new trial where the trial court had erroneously instructed the jury in a way that led the jury to believe that the defendant was held to an ordinary care standard rather than the “highest degree of care” standard
  • errors in jury instructions are “fundamental or controlling” if they “ ‘destroy the substantial correctness of the charge as a whole’ ” or result in “substantial prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward D. Mulally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.