Skip to main content

Youngkin v. Hines

Citations

  • 546 S.W.3d 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney’s reciting of Rule 11 agreement in open court on behalf of client constituted attorney’s “exercise of the right to petition” as defined in TCPA
  • concluding that “[b]y any common understanding of the words” in TCPA definitions, attorney’s “dictation of the Rule 11 agreement into the court record” constituted “ma[king] a statement in a judicial proceeding”
  • concluding that the plaintiff’s right to petition had been violated because the communications were recited in open court and agreeing that entering the communication in the judicial record constituted a communication or statement made in a judicial proceeding
  • noting that focus of inquiry is “on the kind of conduct at issue rather than the alleged wrongfulness of said conduct”
  • reiterating that “legislative intent derives from an act as a whole rather than from isolated portions of it”
  • determining that “Youngkin is entitled to dismissal because he established the affirmative defense of attorney immunity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lehrmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

314 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.