Skip to main content
· 3/10/2016

Samuel Troice v. Proskauer Rose, L.L.P., et

Citations

  • 816 F.3d 341
  • 2016 WL 929476
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while “failure to check a box on the form is not dispositive . . . the absence of a checked box is [ ] one factor in [the scope of the charge] analysis”
  • agreeing “with [plaintiff] that his failure to check [the race] box on the form is not dispositive” of the exhaustion inquiry and explaining “[i]nstead, [the court] look[s] at the charge as a whole, and the absence of a checked box is only one factor in [its] analysis”
  • “Given that [plaintiff] failed to present his claim of race discrimination in his administrative charge, we conclude that he forfeited his claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barksdale, Clement, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.