Skip to main content
· 5/14/2003

Youngblood v. Potter

Citations

  • 262 F. Supp. 2d 1309
  • 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2153
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8332
  • 2003 WL 21142509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding Title VII claims and DFR claims provide “independent and separate options” to an aggrieved employee, such that an EEO charge filed in pursuant of the former does not affect the latter
  • “Absent the filing of an appeal of the Step 1 decision, the Postal Service’s decision at Step 1 and the Union’s actions in assisting with the Plaintiff’s grievance became final actions[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albritton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.