Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/9/1995
Young v. Young
Citations
- 536 N.W.2d 254
- 211 Mich. App. 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, in issue of first impression for Wiretap 19 Act claims, “[b]ecause we find nothing that suggests that Congress confined jurisdiction 20 solely to the federal courts, we conclude that state courts have the authority to adjudicate 21 such claims”
- “Where there is no conflict, state courts are bound by the holdings of federal courts on federal questions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael J. Kelly, P.J., and McDonald and Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Etefia v. Credit Technologies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-04-27· cited 67×
- Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-06-16· cited 27×
- Williams v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-07-29· cited 22×
- People v. RiggsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-08-27· cited 18×
- Bowers v. BowersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-06-20· cited 11×
- Woodman v. Miesel Sysco Food Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-02-20· cited 10×
- Ann Arbor Housing Commission v. WellsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-06-26· cited 10×
- Bunnell v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-06-22· cited 8×
- Williams v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-12-21· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 721×
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 634×
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 563×
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court· 1876-11-13· cited 467×
- Kratz v. KratzE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-08-23· cited 75×
- Schueler v. WeintrobMichigan Supreme Court· 1960-09-15· cited 31×
- Alyas v. GillardMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-09-06· cited 26×
- Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court· 1974-10-21· cited 9×
- Kocsis v. PierceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-11-19· cited 8×
- Schubiner v. New England InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-10-28· cited 7×
- Bruno v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-01-06· cited 4×
- Citron v. CitronSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.