Schueler v. Weintrob

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disclosure of the defendant’s records under 42 CFR 2.66 without compliance with 42 CFR 2.64(d
• “Michigan has, of course, adhered to the rule that a State court is bound by the authoritative holdings of Federal courts upon Federal questions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).