Young v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• this court will not “consider an argument without legal authority specifically supporting the relevant propositions”
• this court may “refuse to consider an argument without legal authority specifically supporting the relevant propositions”
• “An issue which has not been briefed or argued on appeal is deemed abandoned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Howe v. Scannell (In Re Scannell)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1986-04-22· cited 9×
• Eckes v. Keith
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-01-28· cited 6×
• J.C. Prop. Mgmt., LLC v. Kutkut
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-12-06
• Skodowski v. Skodowski
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-03-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-04-27· cited 164×
• Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-10-25· cited 142×
• Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-01-30· cited 122×
• Bahr v. Bahr
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 59×
• Allen v. Allen
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 56×
• Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-11-27· cited 46×
• State v. Schlise
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-11-28· cited 32×
• MacLin v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 29×
• Sommer v. Sommer
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1982-07-15· cited 23×