Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the circuit court “is the ultimate arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses”
• \clearly erroneous\ test may be explained by cases applying the \great weight and clear preponderance\ test
• when the trial judge acts as the finder of fact, it is within the trial judge's authority to draw reasonable inferences from the credible evidence
• “[W]hen the [circuit court] acts as the finder of fact, and where there is conflicting testimony, the [court] is the ultimate arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses.”
• when the 16 No. 2015AP89-D trial judge acts as the finder of fact, it is within the trial judge's authority to draw reasonable inferences from the credible evidence
• when the 16 No. 2015AP89-D trial judge acts as the finder of fact, it is within the trial judge's authority to draw reasonable inferences from the credible evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).