Young v. Kaufman
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3283
Syllabus
Will estate plan will contest directed verdict confidential relationship undue influence evidence abuse of discretion relevance hearsay Evid.R. 801 Evid.R. 802 Evid.R. 803. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in excluding the declarant's statements that appellants attempted to introduce at trial to challenge the validity of the declarant's estate plan.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 477×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1995-09-06· cited 251×
- Beard v. Meridia Huron HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 2005-09-28· cited 123×
- Ament v. Reassure America Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-01-08· cited 43×
- Young v. KaufmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-14· cited 15×
- Knowlton v. SchultzOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-11-21· cited 13×
- Sigler v. BurkOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-26· cited 6×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-19· cited 5×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-11· cited 2×
- Young v. KaufmanOhio Supreme Court· 2018-05-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.