Supreme Court of Florida· 5/2/1985
Young v. Altenhaus
Citations
- 472 So. 2d 1152
- 10 Fla. L. Weekly 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Canady, J., used a different analysis because the case dealt with the enforceability of a contract
- Canady, J., used a different analysis because the case dealt with the enforceability of a contract
- in absence of explicit legislative expression to the contrary, a substantive law is to be construed as having a prospective effect only
- in absence of explicit legislative expression to the contrary, a substantive law is to be construed as having prospective effect only
- characterizing \substantive laws\ as \statutes that interfere with vested rights\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Overton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-02· cited 889×
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. MancusiSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-06· cited 201×
- Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-04-22· cited 82×
- Arrow Air, Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-17· cited 75×
- Bitterman v. BittermanSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-03-26· cited 68×
- Finkelstein v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-20· cited 65×
- Folta v. BoltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-04· cited 56×
- Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Von StetinaSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-16· cited 53×
- City of Orlando v. DesjardinsSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-11· cited 42×
- Gupton v. Village Key & Saw Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-15· cited 42×
- Cantor v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-05· cited 26×
- American Motors Corp. v. AbrahantesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-25· cited 26×
- Basel v. McFarland & Sons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-05· cited 25×
- BDO Seidman v. British Car Auctions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
- FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND v. TillmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-02-27· cited 22×
- In Re Camelot Associates Ltd. PartnershipD. Minnesota· 1989-03-27· cited 21×
- In Re Franklin Pembroke Venture IIE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-10-05· cited 19×
- St. John's Village I v. DEPT., STATEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-20· cited 17×
- City of Winter Haven v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-17· cited 16×
- Chabert v. BacquieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-14· cited 16×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-02· cited 889×
- Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-02-18· cited 242×
- State v. LavazzoliSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-07· cited 95×
- Seddon v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 51×
- Trustees of Tufts College v. Triple R. Ranch, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-03-21· cited 42×
- Parrish v. MullisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-01· cited 10×
- Young v. AltenhausDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-11· cited 9×
- Frankowitz v. PropstDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-09· cited 6×
- Pohlman v. MathewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-21· cited 6×
- Tindall v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-27· cited 4×
- Bethesda Radiology Associates, P.A. v. YaffeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-31· cited 2×
Other cases named Young v. Altenhaus
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.