York v. Paakkonen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• post-judgment order granting motion for entry of partial satisfaction of judgment was appealable under ORS 19.205(3)
• defendant’s objection prevents plaintiff from identifying damages paid by PIP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-06· cited 2×
• Lawrence v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-04

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullins v. ROWE ET UX
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-06-22· cited 28×
• Swett v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-24· cited 27×
• Sedillo v. City of Portland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-03-28· cited 18×
• DeMaris v. Whittier
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-10-04· cited 18×
• Wade v. Mahler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-17· cited 12×
• Mitchell v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 12×
• Dougherty v. Gelco Express Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-21· cited 10×
• Koberstein v. Sierra Glass Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-11-09· cited 7×
• Brus v. Goodell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-31· cited 5×
• Fatehi v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-20· cited 4×
• FATEHI v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-05· cited 3×
• Williams v. Funk
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05· cited 2×
• Koberstein v. Sierra Glass Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 2×
• William v. Funk
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-09· cited 1×