Dougherty v. Gelco Express Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• order that merely reduced the amount of a judgment affected a substantial right for purposes of appeal under former ORS 19.010(2)(c), the former version of ORS 19.205(3)
• we are not permitted to read into the statute a provision that reduces the offset amount when it cannot be determined whether the jury actually awarded the plaintiffs damages already compensated for by the PIP payments
• considering the trial court’s partial “satisfaction” of the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wade v. Mahler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-17· cited 12×
• Mitchell v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 12×
• Brus v. Goodell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-31· cited 5×
• Daniels v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-04· cited 2×
• York v. Paakkonen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-30· cited 2×
• Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-06· cited 2×
• Heintz v. Baxter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-02· cited 1×
• Willhite v. Biff's Seafood Restaurant, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 1×
• MEDEAN v. Moeller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-07

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-30· cited 19×
• Meyer v. Joseph
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-09-07· cited 16×