D. New Jersey· 8/14/1985
Yeager v. Hackensack Water Co.
Citations
- 615 F. Supp. 1087
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16850
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing “relief sought should be tailored to enable plaintiffs and others to make an informed, knowing and educated decision” regarding disclosure of their SSNs
- water company acting under state water restriction order could not obtain social security numbers of customers until it complied with disclosure provision of Privacy Act
- water company acting under state water restriction order could not obtain social security numbers of customers until it complied with disclosure provision of Privacy Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarkson S. Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pontbriand v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-08-15· cited 99×
- Krebs v. RutgersD. New Jersey· 1992-07-22· cited 33×
- UNITED PROPERTY OWNERS ASS'N v. Borough of BelmarNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-07-16· cited 23×
- Doe v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-09-30· cited 21×
- Aronson v. Internal Revenue ServiceD. Massachusetts· 1991-06-24· cited 9×
- Freeman v. Koerner Ford of Scranton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-10· cited 5×
- Brown v. Department of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-07-23· cited 4×
- Ingerman v. Delaware River Port AuthorityD. New Jersey· 2009-06-30· cited 3×
- Opinion NumberLouisiana Attorney General Reports· 1991-11-15
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 1994-01-27
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 1988-06-27
- Untitled California Attorney General OpinionCalifornia Attorney General Reports· 1990-10-31
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1994-07-02
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1988-07-02
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court· 1974-12-23· cited 2,489×
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 2,059×
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 1,729×
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,122×
- Lehrhaupt v. FlynnNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-03-26· cited 41×
- Catherine Jackson, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Metropolitan Edison Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationThird Circuit· 1973-08-21· cited 40×
- Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization v. BauerN.D. Ohio· 1978-12-21· cited 20×
- State v. DroutmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-06-08· cited 14×
- Folmar v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 7×
- Lehrhaupt v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-03-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.