State v. Droutman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• search and seizure by private citizen not subject to constitutional limitations as government had no preknowledge and did not acquiesce in search
• search and seizure by private citizen not subject to constitutional limitations as government had no preknowledge and did not acquiesce in search
• activity of telephone company placing trace on defendant's telephone line to determine source of harassing calls was not State action
• activity of telephone company placing trace on defendant’s telephone line to determine source of harassing calls was not State action
• exclusionary rule inapplicable to searches by private individuals in absence of cooperation with officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).