Sixth Circuit· 7/14/2015

Yazdian v. Conmed Endoscopic Technologies, Inc.

Citations

793 F.3d 634
2015 FED App. 0148P
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12084
127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1057
2015 WL 4231698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that plaintiff's comments to employer, such as “I'm going to respond with counsel,” “I will have an attorney respond,” “Hostile work environment”, etc., put his employer on notice that the plaintiff believed his manager's conduct was illegal
finding that temporal proximity between protected activity and the adverse employment action can establish a causal relationship
explaining that general grievances, without allegations of discrimination, are not protected activities under Title VII
noting that Sixth Circuit cases allow plaintiffs to “establish a prima facie case under either theory”
noting that Sixth Circuit cases allow plaintiffs to “establish a prima facie case under either theory”
reasoning that a plaintiff’s complaint of a hostile work environment after a direct allegation of racial discrimination could constitute a protected activity under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Moore, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Yazdian v. Conmed Endoscopic Technologies, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Yazdian v. ConMed Endoscopic Technologies, Inc.
S.D. Ohio· 2014-06-30

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.