Perlean Griffin v. Carleton Finkbeiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that evidence could be related to a plaintiff’s theory of the case where “various decisionmakers knew of the other decisions” made
• recognizing that evidence could be related to a plaintiffs theory of the case where “various de-cisionmakers knew of the other decisions” made
• recognizing that evidence could be related to a plaintiff’s theory of the case where “various decisionmakers knew of the other decisions” made
• holding that “[a]n individual cannot be held personally liable for violations of Title VII”
• holding “numerous racially insensitive statements” were not direct evidence of discrimination because they did not specifically mention the plaintiff
• explaining that, when deciding whether other acts evidence is admissible under Rule 404(b)(2), a court must consider many factors, including “how closely it relates to the plaintiff’s circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).