District of Columbia· 2/21/2007
Yazdani v. ACCESS ATM
Citations
- 474 F. Supp. 2d 134
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11627
- 2007 WL 528062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he best measure of what the market will allow are [sic] the rates actually charged by the two firms representing these litigants.”’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Facciola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-12· cited 52×
- Woodland v. Viacom Inc.District of Columbia· 2008-11-25· cited 15×
- Miller v. HolzmannD.C. Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 8×
- Novak v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP.District of Columbia· 2007-07-31· cited 7×
- Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-05-20· cited 6×
- McKesson Corporation v. Iran, the Islamic ReDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-27· cited 2×
- Priority One Services, Inc. v. W & T Travel Services, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-22· cited 1×
- Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of IraqDistrict of Columbia· 2021-08-17
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,875×
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 317×
- Salazar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2000-10-30· cited 116×
- Kaseman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2004-07-07· cited 85×
- Huffman v. Saul Holdings Ltd. PartnershipTenth Circuit· 2001-08-22· cited 72×
- Adolph Coors Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeDistrict of Columbia· 2005-08-22· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.