Yates v. Pollock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that such an argument is merely \an indirect attack upon the Legislature's power to place a cap on damages\
• concluding that such an argument is merely \an indirect attack upon the Legislature's power to place a cap on damages\
• finding that the “maximum recovery [for noneconomic damages] permitted in any single medical malpractice action is $250,-000, regardless of the number of plaintiffs involved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).