Krouse v. Graham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that plaintiff need not visually perceive third-party injury to recover
• noting 25 that “damages for mental and emotional distress . . . are not recoverable in a wrongful 26 death action” under California law
• interpreting the contemporary observance requirement to include perception through any of the senses
• interpreting the contemporary observance requirement to include perception through any of the senses
• court noted that direct emotional impact from sensory and contemporaneous observance did not require plaintiff to actually see the accident
• court noted that direct emotional impact from sensory and contemporaneous observance did not require plaintiff to actually see the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).