Skip to main content
· 5/21/1917

Yankaus v. Feltenstein

Citations

  • 244 U.S. 127
  • 37 S. Ct. 567
  • 61 L. Ed. 1036
  • 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1618

Syllabus

<p>The rule that an order of the District Court remanding a cause is conclusive of the right to remove (Jud. Code, § 28) and cannot be reviewed on writ of error to a subsequent judgment of the State court, applies also when the final judgment of the state court is rendered after the attempted removal and before the order of remand, if when the judgment is rendered the .District Court has not assumed jurisdiction and assumes none later beyond enjoining further proceedings until the motion to remand may be decided.</p> <p>Conduct of the plaintiffs in respect of proceedings in the state courts and District Court held not to have estopped them from contesting the jurisdiction of the latter after attempted removal, or to have waived their right to the conclusive effect of the order of remand.</p>

Judges: Day, Pitney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.