YALAMANCHILI v. Mousa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding continuing-tort doctrine did not apply to landowner’s trespass claim, complaining of dead vegetation and foundation damage due to run-off water from neighboring shopping center because he alleged permanent injury to land
• “A trespass cause of action accrues upon discovery of the first physical invasion of the thing on the plaintiff’s property.”
• “[T]he structure creating the runoff, Mousa’s shopping center, is a permanent structure, and such a permanent source is presumed to result in a permanent nuisance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).