Skip to main content
· 6/9/2016

Xiao He Chen v. Lynch

Citations

  • 825 F.3d 83
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10467
  • 2016 WL 3207796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, under the rules of this Court, “we may impose a penalty in cases where the appellant could have no reasonable basis upon which to anticipate that this Court would reverse the trial court’s judgment” (punctuation omitted)
  • imposing maximum 5 sanction for multiple willful violations of Court of Appeals Rules and noting likely violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct
  • enumeration of error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument may be deemed abandoned
  • “Any enumeration of error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument may be deemed abandoned.” (punctuation omitted)
  • “Any enumeration of error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument may be deemed abandoned.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Selya, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.