X Technologies, Inc. v. Marvin Test Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a denial of a directed verdict as to causation where “[t]here [we]re sufficient facts for the jury to infer that” had the defendant not breached the contract, the plaintiff would not have suffered damages
• party waived issue by, inter alia, failing to include it in statement of issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).