Arthur J. Gallagher & Company v. Clayton Ba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a contract that prohibited “serv[ing]” or “sell[ing] to” certain customers could be violated even in the absence of active solicitation
• holding non- compete covenant enforceable because covenant limited to “accounts [employees] worked while employed”
• “Because Plaintiffs were only partially successful in their defense of the judgment below, we decline to award fees at this juncture.”
• non-compete agreement specified all sixty-four Louisiana parishes, including nine parishes where the employee had not worked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).