D. Delaware· 10/26/2006
Wyeth v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Citations
- 248 F.R.D. 169
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79761
- 2006 WL 3091331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting local D. Del. rule establishing a presumption against receiving metadata without a showing of a particularized need for it
- “Emerging standards of electronic discovery appear to articulate a general presumption against the production of metadata. The Default Standard for Discovery of Electronic Documents utilized in this District follows this general presumption.”
- noting current trends in electronic discovery appear to articulate presumption against production of metadata
- “Since the parties have never agreed that electronic documents would be produced in any particular format, [Plaintiff] complied with its discovery obligation by producing image files”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farnan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court· 2017-05-26· cited 97×
- Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of United States Department of Homeland SecurityS.D. New York· 2008-11-21· cited 45×
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.S.D. New York· 2015-02-20· cited 24×
- John B. v. GoetzM.D. Tennessee· 2010-01-28· cited 22×
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-10-21· cited 22×
- Inventio AG v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Americas Corp.D. Delaware· 2009-10-08· cited 14×
- Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2009-06-22· cited 12×
- D'Onofrio v. SFX Sports Group, Inc.District of Columbia· 2008-01-23· cited 11×
- Autotech Technologies LP v. Automationdirect.Com, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2008-04-02· cited 7×
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-25· cited 3×
- Bray & Gillespie Management LLC v. Lexington InsuranceM.D. Florida· 2009-03-04· cited 3×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Air ForceDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-10
- Chix Gear, LLC v. Princess Race Wear Corp.Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2019-11-26
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Wyeth v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.