District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/18/1972
Wyatt v. State
Citations
- 270 So. 2d 47
- 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5724
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining judicial notice as “the cognizance of certain facts which judges and jurors may properly take and act upon without proof, because they already know them” (quoting Mitchum v. State, 251 So. 2d 298, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cross, Reed, Walden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Amos v. MosleySupreme Court of Florida· 1917-12-20· cited 67×
- Birge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-20· cited 32×
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-06-15· cited 15×
- Mitchum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-08-12· cited 13×
- Cagnina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-06-01· cited 5×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-12-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.