Arizona Supreme Court· 6/2/1916
Wuicich v. Solomon-Wickersham Co.
Citations
- 18 Ariz. 164
- 157 P. 972
- 1916 Ariz. LEXIS 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Homestead statutes are enacted as a matter of public policy and in the interest of humanity. One of the objects is that everything shall not be taken from the family, and it left in a state of penury and pauperism, and its members perhaps a public charge”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re IrwinD. Arizona· 2003-04-28· cited 36×
- Union Oil Co. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1922-01-04· cited 28×
- First National Bank of Mesa v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court· 1925-03-27· cited 24×
- Calderon v. Lang (In Re Calderon)Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-28· cited 19×
- Schreiber v. HillArizona Supreme Court· 1939-11-13· cited 14×
- In Re ForeacreD. Arizona· 2006-12-29· cited 11×
- Mounce v. WightmanArizona Supreme Court· 1926-02-17· cited 11×
- Plant v. Goernitz (In Re Plant)D. Arizona· 2003-02-10· cited 6×
- Matter of BrosiusC.D. California· 1980-12-22· cited 6×
- In Re BuchbergerD. Arizona· 2004-07-06· cited 6×
- In Re AllmanD. Arizona· 2002-12-12· cited 4×
- First National Bank v. BoydD. Arizona· 1974-06-11· cited 2×
- Candelario Vargas v. Muñiz DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2007-06-07· cited 1×
- Serrano Irizarry, Carlos v. Angueira Soto, Brenda LTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico· 2026-04-29
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.