D. Arizona· 12/12/2002
In Re Allman
Citations
- 286 B.R. 402
- 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 1591
- 2002 WL 31811905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- homestead includes entire contiguous parcel of land on which a residence sits, regardless of whether it consists of one or more lots as determined by the subdivision plat or assessor’s parcel numbers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randolph J. Haines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-01· cited 29×
- Wuicich v. Solomon-Wickersham Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1916-06-02· cited 19×
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelEighth Circuit· 2002-10-24· cited 18×
- Wheeler Perry Co. v. Mortgage Bond Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1932-12-27· cited 12×
- Kwiecinski v. Community First National Bank of Powell (In Re Kwiecinski)Tenth Circuit· 2000-03-17· cited 8×
- In Re FiffyD. Massachusetts· 2002-08-06· cited 7×
- In Re FlattN.D. New York· 1993-03-05· cited 6×
- In Re JeffersonD. New Mexico· 1993-11-30· cited 3×
- In Re ZantmanD. Idaho· 2001-04-10· cited 2×
- In Re CoinS.D. Florida· 1999-09-24· cited 1×
- Anderson v. OdishoNinth Circuit· 1937-05-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.